I laid out my points pretty clearly. I don't feel triggered by your comments because it was your opinions and I simply presented argument why I disagree to it and with the presented counterarguments, I will try to be as accurate as I can cos it is my job. I will provide stats and references to back it up and stays away from assumptions as much as I could. That's all there to it.
Yes, most of the games in Act 2 were practice games but on the games that they did pitch in official Tournament, Sawamura still performed consistently better than Furuya stat wise including both the Senbatsu and Spring Tourney and that by when the decision to choose the Ace was made, it was clear Sawamura was better (again) stat wise. Regarding the game with Hachiya Ouji, I would agree that Furuya was better than he was previously for the majority of Act 2 in terms of his mentality but was he truly better than he was in the Komadai game? We don't know. I said context matters and in this context Hachiya Ouji was no Komadai, to be able to shutout Komadai for 8 innings since the 1st inning is a big feat and Miyuki said in that day Furuya had everything going, command, breaking pitches, velocity and even his mental toughness was there. How can we know from a vague comment that "he was in a rare state" that he performed better than the performance of Komadai or not? My view would be no considering the caliber of opponents but we don't know and I don't want to assume definitely that he was.
No, Furuya wasn't better than Sawamura in Act 2 because he was injured or mentally unstable, it was because he could not maintain his form consistently. Furuya was injured for a better part of 2 weeks and still for the majority of Act 2, Furuya experienced ups and downs before the Summer Tournament began, he's still exceptional when he's on but when he wasn't on, there were still much to be desired. Injuries and mental pressure are part of being an athlete, as much as some who will experience growth, some will experience setbacks as well, as part of their development as a player. I am not in anyway saying Furuya is a lesser pitcher because of this but the way he has been developing in Act 2, he's experienced bigger hurdles than he's had in his 1st year and he wasn't able to remain as consistent as Sawamura so the later became the better pitcher. My point stands on which pitcher being better because there is no argument provided that can support the former point that you made about "Sawamura being the Ace doesn't mean he's better than Furuya". The topic of discussion here is Eijun or Furuya - who should be the Ace and different from you who thinks Sawamura became the Ace because he can lead the team better, and not that because he was flat out better than Furuya in terms of pitching, my belief is that Sawamura should be the Ace and he became the Ace because he was flat out the better pitcher for the majority of Act 2. I find it surprising that many fans still find it hard to believe that Sawamura has became a better pitcher than Furuya already and the stat lines support that. When a pitcher is better than the other, he's just better and I won't disregard that fact. Furuya was better than Sawamura in their first Summer Tournament and Furuya fastball made him so far ahead of the competition and could be a contributor early for the team. In Fall Tourney, when Furuya was the Ace of the team, Sawamura was actually the better pitcher and he pitched more innings (24.7 IP to Furuya's 21.3 IP) and gave up less runs than Furuya (RA=1.82 to Furuya's 4.64). In Senbatsu Furuya was the better pitcher but in Spring, Sawamura was much better than Furuya (RA=0.75 to Furuya's 2.82 for the combination of Senbatsu and Spring Tourney) and then Sawamura maintained this level of performance for the majority of Act 2 which earned him the Ace title. Many argue "if Furuya isn't injured he would be consistently better" but that's a moot point because staying healthy is again part of being an athlete so we should not cross out injury and performance flux due to pressure as a non-factor to determine which pitcher is better than another because these are very much part of being a pitcher, similarly, there is no excuse for Sawamura to be not good when started out, he lacks experience and knowledge and just wasn't all that good, it is what it is. If Furuya wants to be straight up better, he has to stay healthy to maintain his performance and if Sawamura wants to be better than Furuya, he has to consistently pitch better than Furuya does and he objectively did, for the most part of Act 2. I would personally defend Furuya if people argues he's a horrible pitcher because that's factually wrong and similarly, it's also factually wrong to claim when Sawamura got the Ace number he wasn't a better pitcher. Perhaps you meant the purpose of being the Ace and not actually the performance aspect of these pitchers or maybe not and that's fine, everyone is entitled to an opinion and I just responded to points I disagree with.
Perhaps you misunderstood my point, my point wasn't to say Furuya is not a prodigy and I stated this point very clearly, the point I disagreed with is to use Furuya as an example as a prodigy to determine that Sawamura is not. With your latest comment you presenting how Sawamura was not and is one now and I'm somewhat satisfied with that answer. The better description would be that Sawamura isn't an apparent prodigy because he was barely trained so his talents are mostly hidden and unexplored and frankly Sawamura's set of talents are often overlooked or underestimated so the misconception is that Sawamura is purely a hard-worker that sort of, for a lack of a better word, overachieved while in reality is Sawamura is extremely talented as a pitcher who has to work extra hard to make up the time that he wasted compare to other pitchers including Furuya, who have been trained at some level and more extensively than he did.
Sawamura has been very humble since the turning point of his career that was the yips, the fact that he thinks he's not better than Furuya is irrelevant to the reality that he pitches better than Furuya for the majority of Act 2. Furuya can overwhelm batters with just his fastball, Sawamura has to utilize different pitch combinations and he respects Furuya for that, whether which method is better, it's inconclusive base on just the the speech. Characters have been wrong with their statements many times, such as Ochiai being repeated wrong about his assessments of the players of Seidou and how Miyuki literally said they shouldn't be worried about Furuya cos he can figure it out and then the guy went and injured his shoulder in that same evening, so when I compare and analyze performance, I prefer to use stats to back up my points beside just relying on pure characters' dialogues. Regardless of what Sawamura says, Furuya is a critical member of the team is because he's still one of Seidou's best pitchers, their 2nd best starting pitcher and is one of the best pitchers in Tokyo Prefecture. Sawamura being the Ace doesn't mean he would push Furuya into obsolescence, far from it, and it's funny to me how often it is when a person presents an argument for either case it always results in a misunderstanding that an extreme has to happen that Seidou doesn't need Furuya because Sawamura is so good already or Seidou doesn't need Sawamura because Furuya has recovered. Seidou is blessed with 2 exceptional pitchers, it would be to their detriment if they don't utilize both of them to their maximum potential and it would be uninformative to argue they should use only 1 of them. That's what it means for both Sawamura and Furuya to be pillars of the team, that's what it means to have a Co-Ace.